Earth Aliens On
Resources for those who are stranded here
Our Bookstore is OPEN
Over 5000 new & used titles, competitively priced!
Topics: UFOs - Paranormal - Area 51 - Ghosts - Forteana - Conspiracy - History - Biography - Psychology - Religion - Crime - Health - Geography - Maps - Science - Money - Language - Recreation - Technology - Fiction - Other - New
Search... for keyword(s)  

Location: Mothership -> Ufo -> Updates -> 1997 -> Mar -> Re: Devereux - Rutkowski EL/TST

UFO UpDates Mailing List

Re: Devereux - Rutkowski EL/TST

For other Cohen/Devereux discussions
Click here

From: "Jerry Cohen" <>
Web Site:
Date: Sun, 9 Mar 1997 19:48:59 -0500
Fwd Date: Sun, 09 Mar 1997 22:44:01 -0500
Subject: Re: Devereux - Rutkowski EL/TST

Mime-Version: 1.0
Date: Thu, 27 Feb 1997 07:05:23 -0500
From: UFO UpDates - Toronto <>
Subject: UFO UpDate: Re: Devereux - Rutkowski EL/TST

Date: Wed, 26 Feb 1997 17:58:30 -0500 (EST)
Subject: Devereux-Rutowski:EL/TST

Hello Paul,

I am a person who believes in the possibility of ELs & EQLs as
related to TST and that they may indeed represent _a small
percentage_ of the already investigated cases of UFOs. Furthermore, I
personally support any efforts scientists make in furthering their
knowledge regarding these highly interesting topics.

However, as previously mentioned with regards to its applications to
UFOs, I believe your theory has tended to neglect the fact that many
ufologists already mentally put these "nocturnal light" cases in a
lesser category, in view of the fact that out of the multitude of
cases in existence, they are _lesser detailed cases_, and by
definition, concern amorphous, rather than, "visibly-structured"
objects. Therefore, although your work is highly interesting and will
probably help us become aware of certain natural phenomena that exist
on and within our planet, its applications to UFO sightings per se
are necessarily limited.

Many researchers prefer to address cases which are "higher-detailed"
"witness-supported" and, certainly where possible, "radar-visual"
supported as well.

Even if one focuses on "nocturnal light" cases, one must realize that
there are different sub-classifications of this grouping as well. It
logically must be ascertained what motion the lights are making;
whether simply floating in a random pattern or making what appear to
be non-random, or what might be considered, "intelligent" moves. Are
they interacting with one another? Exactly what type of interaction?
Are they found within or out of the atmosphere? Has one or more of
them shot off into outer space? How do ELs or EQLs normally maneuver?
Are the nocturnal lights in question behaving like normal ELs & EQLs
or is their pattern actually inconsistent with same? Each individual
case must be carefully examined one at a time to see if it conforms
or deviates from an established "norm" for ELs, EQLs, etc.

Oh, by the way, do you feel that "norm" is actually established? If
so, could you possibly point me to this information? I truly would be
most thankful to have this data against which to evaluate cases.

What I find myself objecting to most concerning the presentations I
have seen concerning Persinger's work is that it has been touted, by
the media, as being the "solution" to the UFO enigma. If Persinger
feels any differently, he most certainly has a major scientific
obligation to correct this. Until he does, all protestations to the
contrary, no serious UFO researcher can consider what he is doing as
"scientifically ethical" and, at the minimum, to those researchers,
everything else he states regarding the issue is thereby justifiably
suspect as well.

A skeptic writing to this mail list on 13 Feb. 97 wrote:

>And I'm sufficiently impressed by what I know is "in the pipeline"
>to think *some* UFOs are caused by *some* kind of natural light
>phenomenon *somehow* caused by tectonic events (or *some* of them),
>at least probably. ....snip....

Most UFO researchers have never said any different and I couldn't
agree more. Please note the repeated use of the words "some" &
"somehow." However, anyone that thinks they have solved the _entire_
UFO enigma by simply studying nocturnal "lights" and their causes or
claiming "_most_ people who see UFOs must be hallucinating" because
his "helmet" data tells him so, is unfortunately oblivious to a wide
spectrum of UFO data gathered over many years by competent
researchers. Although much of the data is not numerical, some of it
is, and certainly undeniably real, and to be taken seriously.

To become a little more acquainted with where some of the better
cases may reside and to appreciate why gaps exist in our present
knowledge, I would recommend reading the following 7-part rebuttal
which I wrote to answer an essay James Oberg wrote in his effort to
downplay Gordon Cooper's UFO claims. These are archived at the
following Web address along with Mr. Oberg's original essay:

Since I know your time is limited (as ours is too), beginning with
"O/C rebuttal: part 2" might be logical, as it presents one small
piece of "UFO data" for one's evaluation. Perhaps you could tell us
how this case might fit with your theories or possibly have "other
scientists you know" explain it for us.

As Chris pointed out along the way, a relatively large number of
sightings are not so easily explained by any of the theories your
group is investigating. A number of the sightings to which I am
refering are of _structured craft_ of various types that have been
documented as interacting with people; sometimes large groups of
people. If you have not read it recently or are not familiar with it,
the following Blue Book case (Exeter, N.H., 1965 ) archived at the
following addresses, may possibly be enlightening:

Exeter 1/2
Exeter 2/2

The Exeter case was taken in its entirety from: Hynek, J. Allen .
"The Hynek UFO Report" . paperback, pp 154-166 . Dell Publishing Co.
1977 : which gleaned a basic portion of its material directly from
the Air Force's Project Blue Book files. (If you do not have Web
access for any reason, I would be happy to send it to you by email.)

Paul, I can't help but wonder where _"Exeter"_ fits in your theories?
I am curious as to what tectonic, electromagnetic, etc. forces you
feel may have caused all the people in varied circumstance, in this
case,  to "mass hallucinate" the exact object they have separately
related therein. There were approximately 60 or so witnesses to this
case. Any "newbies" to our mail list who perhaps may be reading
"Exeter" for the first time might, after reading same, then possibly
examine both your accumulated data and Mr. Persinger's to see if they
find any solid answers to "Exeter" residing therein.

I am sure you can direct us to these. If I've already missed this, I
apologize as I was not able to follow the entire thread of your
conversation with Chris. Perhaps this might be a good time to convey
this again to those who might also have missed it.

Thank you.

Jerry Cohen

E-mail:  "Jerry Cohen" <>

P.S.    As all letters to this mail list, this letter is being
archived on the Web at the following address.

It can be found by locating the approximate date of this post and
then finding the subject "Re: UFO UpDate: Re: Devereux - Rutkowski
EL/TST" listed therein. Reading it there will permit one to click on
the addresses and go directly to the articles mentioned herein.

P.P.S.    Forthcoming will be Dr. Hynek's reevaluation of Blue Book
unidentifieds and a detailing of the classification system he gave us
back in 1972. I am doing this so readers can clearly see where TST
and its related theories presently stand in the grand scheme of
things regarding UFOs.

For other Cohen/Devereux discussions
Click here

Page from the website of:
Search for other documents to/from: rjcohen | devereuxp

[ Next Message | Previous Message | This Day's Messages ]
[ This Month's Index | UFO UpDates Main Index | MUFON Ontario ]

UFO UpDates - Toronto -
Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp - ++ 416-696-0304

A Hand-Operated E-Mail Subscription Service for the Study of UFO Related Phenomena.
To subscribe please send your first and last name to
Message submissions should be sent to the same address.

[ UFO Topics | People | Ufomind What's New | Ufomind Top Level ]

To find this message again in the future...
Link it to the appropriate Ufologist or UFO Topic page.

Archived as a public service by Area 51 Research Center which is not responsible for content.
Software by Glenn Campbell. Technical contact:

Financial support for this web server is provided by the Research Center Catalog.